Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Rod Blagojevich's Apology: Genuine or Fake?


Analysis of Apologia: Rod Blagojevich’s Courtroom Apology December 7, 2011
Introduction
Rod Blagojevich is a former congressman and was then Governor of Illinois from 2003 until 2009, when he was impeached during his second term (Chicago Tribune, 2011). Blagojevich was elected on a platform of ethics reform and anti-corruption in 2003. Rod labeled the climate in Illinois as a “culture of corruption” and wanted to end the cynicism among the majority of Illinoisans (Chicago Tribune, 2011).  But beginning in June of 2004, a little more than a year since Blagojevich had been elected, a number of state and federal investigations into his administration began (Chicago Tribune, 2011). The investigation began with “allegations of wrongdoing involving state hiring, board appointments, contracting and fundraising that battered his tenure” (Chicago Tribune, 2011).
While at first Blagojevich himself was not directly in the investigative spotlight, his top adviser and fundraiser, Antoin "Tony" Rezko  and Stuart Levine, a GOP Chicagoan politico , were and had cut a deal to split profits from a state education pension fund (Chicago Tribune, 2011).  Levine was the first to be wire tapped in 2004 and investigated and was indicted in May of 2005 on corruption charges. Other state education leaders plead guilty that year to extortion scheme charges and a “federal grand jury investigation into the alleged political hiring practices of the Blagojevich administration” begins (Chicago Tribune, 2011).  By 2006, the FBI was investigating charges that over 300 jobs were awarded to applicants who applied through the ‘back door’ or other roundabout and politically connected ways. This same year, Rezko was indicted on “federal charges he sought millions of dollars in kickbacks and campaign donations from firms seeking state business” and Blagojevich’s wife, Patty, began to be investigated for a real estate scheme involving favoritism and fraud (Chicago Tribune, 2011).  
In August of 2008 Blagojevich vetoed a state anti-corruption bill, saying it wasn’t tough enough and that it needed to include more state lawmakers, including himself. To add even more irony to the situation, a Rasmussen poll done in December of 2008, showed that Blagojevich’s approval rating was at 7%, the lowest in American history for a governor (Politico, 2008). Only four months later, the FBI arrested “Blagojevich and his chief of staff at their homes on a broad array of corruption charges, including asking for favors in exchange for his selection of a replacement in the senate for President-elect Barack Obama” (Chicago Tribune, 2011). In 2009 Blagojevich was impeached, but it was not until December of 2011, after his retrial, that he was found guilty of a variety of other corruption charges, and sentenced to 14 years in prison.  Throughout the seven years of scandal, Blagojevich vehemently denied allegations and swore to fight them relentlessly. In fact, during a courtroom motion the government reminds the jury that is was Blagojevich who first brought the media attention to the investigations and that the “defendant engaged in an unprecedented national media campaign … for the purpose of influencing public opinion, and that campaign was bound to have some impact, even if it was not the impact defendant had hoped for“ (Sweeney, 2011).
By opposing the allegations and lying about his innocence for over six years, and then finally apologizing the day of his sentencing, Blagojevich invalidates his apology through the denial of all the charges in the first place. Additionally, he uses a variety of apologia strategies in his final apology on December 7, 2011, to circumvent taking responsibility for his actions and apologizing outright. This history of denial, and his ornery attitude and determination to fight are two of the largest barriers for Blagojevich to overcome, once being proven guilty. However, the fact that there were taped recordings proving his guiltiness which were readily available to the public, and the fact that he was already found guilty of multiple corruption charges, only contributed more to the barrier of making a fool of himself through his poorly thought comments prior to this apology. Blagojevich only has one small possible advantage, which is that Illinoisans already viewed Chicago politics as corrupt, and therefor may have been more desensitized since the same thing happened to their previous governor. In the following analysis I will consider how Blagojevich used a variety of apologia strategies in his final apology to the courtroom, judge, and the people of Illinois.
Analysis
            In his apology on December 7, 2011, Blagojevich addresses many of the barriers he is facing. He directly admits to the judge that he was out-of-hand and immature and directly apologizes for his actions. Later on in the speech he continues to make excuses for his actions, but at the beginning does apologize directly for them. As far as the recordings go, he did not directly speak about the content, but admitted he spoke poorly for a governor. And, though he had already been found guilty, he said he agreed with the people for finding him as such.  In his apologia, Blagojevich utilizes evasion of responsibility, shifting the blame (and denial initially), transcendence, corrective action, and mortification.
            Blagojevich’s use of making his good intentions known only served as a way to evade responsibility for his actions. If having good intentions qualifies as a blame shifter, Blagojevich has plenty of these. In his apology Blagojevich says, “I honestly believe, let me withdraw that…I-I never set out to break the law. I never set out to cross the line” (Lara, 2011).  Blagojevich wants to make sure everyone knows, even in his final media hour, that his intentions were pure of heart. He continues in his apology to say “it was always my intention, back in 2008, to try to see if I could do those things on the right side of the line. I thought they were permissible and I was mistaken and a jury convicted me” (Lara, 2011). The most interesting this about this statement is that he is not apologizing for what the jury convicted him of. Instead, he insists he tried to do things legally in 2008. This brings up many questions of Blagojevich’s ethos, since court documents had proven that Blagojevich was involved in wrongdoings since at least 2006, and most likely aware of there being done as early as 2003. While reporters who heard the apology said it was an unusually meek tone for the usually boisterous governor to use, the sentence still shows his true character, and that if he could not do things “on the right side of the line,” he would continue his plan regardless of where his actions may fall ethically and legally. It could also be argued that Blagojevich’s reference to his amateur boxing career could be considered a tool of provocation. When he says “I’m accustomed to fighting back, and I did, and it was inappropriate,” he indirectly blames his actions (lashing out and vowing to fight), on his experience as a boxer, and argued that it was in his nature (Lara, 2011).  
            While the boxing reference could be provocation, it could also be likened closely to flat-out denial. “I have a tendency sometimes to speak before I think,” is Blagojevich’s first statement to the judge in his apology (Lara, 2011). At this point, he begins to not shift the blame on others, but to shift the blame onto a poor personality trait of his own that is part of his nature. Him likening his behavior to his attitude as a boxer is also a way to shift the blame, or deny direct guilt.  He does eventually admit his wrongdoing, but not until he has already shifted to cause of his actions to his defensive nature.
Blagojevich’s “good intentions” also got him into trouble because he tried to use them to minimize the severity of the allegations against him. Blagojevich’s apologia also used the mortification strategy. He responded through aggression due to shame and humiliation. Denial and a commitment to fight are typical behaviors of mortification. Blagojevich also adds insult to injury because at this time, over 84% of Illinois voters said he should resign prior to being found guilty. (Rasmussen Reports, 2011).
Conclusion
            Since this apology, Blagojevich has been sentenced to 14 years in prison and is currently serving that time. His predecessor is also still in prison as well. Though Blagojevich spent a tremendous amount of energy and time working to clear his name, his undeniable guilt could not be avoided. While he said he was sorry, he never profusely apologized for breaking the law. In fact, his “sorry” only served to make the reader think he was sorry for being caught.
            Blagojevich’s advantage was so small, and based on a general desensitization to corruption, that he was not able to effectively overcome the overwhelming amount of barriers in this situation. Since he lacked evidence, he relied solely on his pathos and ethos, which were not well thought-out or credible.
            Blagojevich could have taken this opportunity to confess his wrongdoing opening, and to sincerely and deeply apologize for breaking the law repeatedly and being unethical. Instead, he continued to use the same strategies and practices that he was familiar with.           

Works Cited

Chicago Tribune. (2011, May 31). Blagojevich Impeached: Timeline of the Blagojevich investigation. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-investigation-timeline-1208,0,2680294.story
Lara, B. I. (2011, December 7). Transcript of remarks by Rod Blagojevich and Judge James Zagel at sentencing. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-blago-zagel-transcript-sentencing-20111209-pdf,0,663171.htmlpage
Pew Research Center For The People And The Press. (2008, December 18). Blagojevich Arrest Grabs Public Attention. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from Pew Research: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1060/blagojevich-arrest-grabs-public-attention
Politico. (2008, December 11). Blagojevich's Approval Rating at 7 Percent. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from Politico: http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1208/Blagojevichs_approval_rating_at_7_percent.html
Project For Excellence In Journalism. (2008, December 16). Blagojevich Framed as Obama's First Crisis. Retrieved October 2010, 2012, from Pew Research Center: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1056/blagojevich-framed-as-obamas-first-crisis
Rasmussen Reports. (2011, December 11). 84% of Illinois Voters Say Blagojevich Should Resign. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from Rasmussen Reports: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/december_2008/84_of_illinois_voters_say_blagojevich_should_resign
Sweeney, A. (2011, August 23). Blagojevich prosecutors deny allegations of bias. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-blagojevich-prosecutors-deny-allegations-of-bias-20110823,0,2667746.story

No comments:

Post a Comment