I recently wrote a
rhetorical analysis of an apologia from Rod Blagojevich after his was found
guilty and sentenced to 14 years in prison on corruption charges. While
researching and reading quotes from Blagojevich, I began to formulate what
constitutes ethical communications to me. Below are a couple standards I hold
myself accountable to in any communication, whether personal, professional, or
any other situation.
I believe all
persons should always try to be respectful and trustworthy in all communications.
If a person does not feel respected, there is already a barrier in the line of
communication. If the communicator is not trustworthy, they will never be
credible or believable. I also always try to be friendly and welcoming at all
times. Sometimes a situation may not call for outright friendliness. When this
is not possible, I still maintain patience and respectfulness. Another respect
issue that accompanies many miscommunications is learning how to listen.
Listening is key to understanding, and to be an ethical and effective
communicator, one must be able to listen and think before reacting.
I also always try
to be as direct and sincere as possible, and appreciate the same. When faced
with allegations or a potential misunderstanding, miscommunication, or outright
mistake, I apologize directly and honestly and own-up to any direct actions and
responsibility. I have also learned to try to avoid using apologia strategies
in rhetoric, as this is always misinterpreted as not genuine, and is usually
not a sincere apology.
I am confident
there are other areas of ethical communication that I have overlooked. But
without Googling “define ethical communication” these are the best answers I
came up with on my own.
No comments:
Post a Comment